gb-users mailing list archive
<-- Chronological -->
Extended
<-- Thread -->

RE: Newbe ques - DSL/PPPoE workaround needed

To: "'adykes_at_softportsystems_dot_com'" <adykes_at_softportsystems_dot_com>
Subject: RE: Newbe ques - DSL/PPPoE workaround needed
From: Brian Murtari <bmurtari_at_thomcastcom_dot_com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:48:19 -0500
Cc: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com

Al,

Hmm, yep it would be a hack but it should work, I would put the Linksys box
in and configure the GNATBox as the DMZ client (it only allows one).  I have
NOT tried this but it should work.

Brian Murtari

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Dykes [mailto:adykes_at_softportsystems_dot_com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 9:06 AM
To: Darren Besler
Cc: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
Subject: Re: Newbe ques - DSL/PPPoE workaround needed


Send postings to: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
Access the list archives at:
http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
----------------------------------
Subject:        	Re: Newbe ques - DSL/PPPoE workaround needed
To:             	bmurtari_at_thomcastcom_dot_com (Brian Murtari)
Date sent:      	Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:32:25 -0600 (CST)
Copies to:      	gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
From:           	Darren Besler <gnatbox_at_beehive.mb_dot_ca>
Send reply to:  	Darren Besler <dbesler_at_beehive.mb_dot_ca>

> Send postings to: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
> Access the list archives at:
> http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
> ----------------------------------
> Brian Murtari wrote:
> > From: Brian Murtari <bmurtari_at_thomcastcom_dot_com>
> > To: "'jvitiel_at_bellatlantic_dot_net'" <jvitiel_at_bellatlantic_dot_net>
> > Cc: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
> > Subject: RE: Newbe ques - DSL/PPPoE workaround needed
> > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 20:20:23 -0500
> >
> > John,
> > 
> > I will tell you same as I was told by GTA. GNATBox (Pro or Lite) does
not
> > currently support PPPoE.  There are future plans (there is not a release
> > date) to support PPPoE.  I think the current problem is how do you
squeeze
> > ten pounds of shit into a five pound bag (oh those "floppy" blues).
Even if
> > you get all the settings in place I believe it will still not work.
> > 
> > What I am using in the mean time is a Linksys product...
> > http://www.linksys.com/scripts/features.asp?part=BEFSR41
> > The PPPoE code is in beta but it seems to be working well with both DHCP
and
> > PPPoE.  But it does not have or have immediate future plans for VPN.
> > 
> > I Need VPN, DHCP, DNS, AND PPPoE all in one cheap box, whoever builds it
> > will be my GOD!
> > 
> > Brian Murtari
> 

Linksys makes a 4-port hub +dsl/cable router (called EtherFast) for 
under $200 and the vendor just released PPPoE code for it.  This is 
discussed in comp.dcom.xdsl.   

Can I put the Linksys router in front of the GNATbox  to handle 
PPPoE ? I understand this is an ugly hack and costs a few bucks
but if it works as an interim work around I might do it.  

> PPPoE is probably a bad idea in the big picture. The concept of IP
connectivity
> and the general flexibility and openness that IP connectivity provides is
> lost when PPPoE is deployed. The issue of ADSL tunneling, etc is something
> the providers/ADSL modems should have addressed inside the ADSL modem and
not
> in the clients workstation.
> 
> It appears that PPPoE has found itself as an adopted technology. Users
have
> to complain to their providers advising of the displeasure of having to
> deploy this software to their desktops to achieve connectivity. I express
> my displeasure by advising people to get a cable modem before they get
ADSL.
> 
> Firewalls are a fact of life now adays. People need to protect themselves
> and PPPoE's requirement to install on the client does not allow a firewall
> layer to be added between the client and the Internet.
> 
> Hats off to GTA for going out on a limb and making a first class firewall
> like GNATbox "free" for the typical end user sitting on the end of a
dedicated
> connection that needs to be secured from the "evils" of the Internet.
Forcing
> firewall companies, like GTA, to have to add this layer of support to
their
> products forces them to direct efforts away from the real technologies
that
> they are good at.
> 
> -- 
> Darren Besler
> Beehive Enterprises
> Email:  dbesler_at_beehive.mb_dot_ca
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo_at_gta_dot_com
> with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
> in the body of the message
> 


Al Dykes                  adykes_at_softportsystems_dot_com
-------------
Softport Systems, Inc
Voice: 212 889-6575 x 225        Fax:  212 683-3961
----------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo_at_gta_dot_com
with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
in the body of the message

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Global Technology Associates, Inc