gb-users mailing list archive
<-- Chronological -->
Extended
<-- Thread -->

RE: IDE Device?

To: "'Ryan Colp'" <rcolp_at_csil_dot_net>
Subject: RE: IDE Device?
From: Brian Murtari <bmurtari_at_thomcastcom_dot_com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 18:08:33 -0500
Cc: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com

Ryan,

I am not exactly sure but I believe this is what they are basically using in
their hardware based products (GB-100)

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Colp [mailto:rcolp_at_csil_dot_net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 4:24 PM
To: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
Subject: IDE Device?


Send postings to: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
Access the list archives at:
http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
----------------------------------
A while ago we were discussing the need for a larger capacity media to run
GNATbox from.  There were strong feelings from myself and others that using
a hard drive (especially an old one!) is a bad idea from a reliability
standpoint.  The fact remains that GTA will need to find a way to store more
data as more features and device support are added.  Some of the ideas were
to use two floppy drives, a hard drive, or a flash card.

I saw something neat today...  Solid State IDE drives that use Flash memory!
I knew that there were flash cards available...but this one actually
connects and behaves like an IDE hard disk.  Extremely cool!  You can get
modules that perch on the IDE connector of your motherboard, or you can get
2.5 and 3.5" IDE flash drives that fit in a drive bay with no moving parts.


I found these devices at Advantech, and I'm sure there are or will be more
manufacturers to choose from in the future... http://www.advantech.com

Putting GNATbox on a solid-state storage device would make the software
version every bit as reliable as the GTA hardware solution!  The only moving
parts you're left with are the cooling fans!  Two-floppy support is a good
idea...but solid state is a great idea.

So while I was against the notion of using IDE drives in the past, in this
case I would be all for the idea of seeing IDE support in GNATbox...just as
long as people don't use old hard drives that will develop bad sectors much
sooner than later and cause a tech support nightmare!  

Ain't technology great?  Yaay Flash!

-Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Congdon [mailto:hostmaster_at_congdonweb_dot_net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 1:53 PM
To: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
Subject: RE: remote logging configuration problems


Send postings to: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
Access the list archives at:
http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
----------------------------------
Is there any chance that GnatBox will be able to be stored on an IDE device?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Holland" <nhollan_at_home_dot_com>
To: <gb-users_at_gta_dot_com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: remote logging configuration problems


> Send postings to: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
> Access the list archives at:
> http://www.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
> ----------------------------------
> I have seen a message similar to that...it was due to having the
> write-protect slide set on the GB disk.  Is this possible in your
> case?  After a little disaster many years ago, my finger just
> automatically write-protects diskettes when they pass through my
> hand...often on the way to being formatted or otherwise being written
> to.  8-)
>
> Failing that, how about a bad floppy or drive?  I'm interpreting
> Input/Output error as a pretty clear message that something went wrong
> durring the write, and that's pretty simple in GB's case.  I don't
> think it directly delt with the logging setup.
>
> Nick.
>
>
>
> Seth Clark wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to setup logging but get the following message when trying to
> > save my
> > Remote logging configuration.
> > I'm using: GNAT Box Light Version: 3.0.1
> >
> > Unable to save remote logging configuration.
> > Input/output error.
> >
> > Syslog server IP address:   192.168.1.45
> > Filter facility:   local1
> > NAT facility:  local0
> > WWW facility:  local2
> > Priority to log tunnel opens:  warning5
> > Priority to log tunnel closes:  warning5
> > Priority to log WWW pages accessed:  warning5
> >
> >  192.168.1.45 is the address of a NT box where I have syslog.exe running
> >
> > Any Suggestions?
> >
> > Seth
> >
> ----------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo_at_gta_dot_com
> with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
> in the body of the message
>

----------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo_at_gta_dot_com
with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
in the body of the message
----------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo_at_gta_dot_com
with "unsubscribe gb-users your_email_address
in the body of the message

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Global Technology Associates, Inc