gb-users mailing list archive
<-- Chronological -->
Extended
<-- Thread -->

Re: Blocking Spoofed Addresses

To: <ecovert_at_icscorp_dot_com>
Subject: Re: Blocking Spoofed Addresses
From: Paul Emerson <paul_at_gta_dot_com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:04:40 -0500
Cc: gb-users_at_gta_dot_com
In-reply-to: <>
References: <>

Ed,

1. You can not specify port numbers without a protocol.

2. The implicit GNAT Box rule will block these packets so no filter is required. However the last system generate DEFAULT Remote Access rule is inplace to increment the Alarm count for rejected packets. So the trick is to put a filter(s) prior to the last Remote Access filter to block the packet, don't log it, don't send email and don't increment the Alarm count.

2. If you want to block this NetBIOS stuff and don't log it or increment the alarm count I suggest:

1. Deny ANY TCP bcast nolog
   from: 172.16.4.0/255.255.255.0
     to: ANY_IP 139

2. Deny ANY UDP bcase nolog
   from: 172.16.4.0/255.255.255.0
   to: ANY_IP 137 138


Paul


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All,
Below is one of my remote access rules:
#Block Inbound Reserved IP addresses (172.16.4.0)
       Deny   "EXTERNAL" ALL  bcast log email
          from 172.16.4.0/255.255.255.0 137 138 139
            to "ANY_IP" 137 138 139

172.16.4.0 is our internal address scheme.  I received this email
alarm (plus many more) from the GB:

ALARM NO: 1
         DATE: Monday, Mar 13, 2000
         TIME: 11:05:48
    INTERFACE: EXT (xl0)
   ALARM TYPE: Possible spoof
    IP PACKET: UDP  [172.16.4.235/137]-->[172.16.4.255/137]  l=68
                    [172.16.4.235/137]-->[172.16.4.255/137]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION:
	Return interface for IP packet is different than arrival.

Ok, here then are my questions:
1.  Do I really need this RA rule?  It is an inbound connection but
those are disallowed by default.  However, when an IP Packet is
rejected, normally the 'DETAILED DESCRIPTION' says so.  Spoofed
packets do not say they are rejected.  Are they?
2.  If I do need the rule, GBAdmin has a problem with the rule (it's
icon turns red); it does not like the "Source Ports for Universal
Filters" I have placed on it.  Have I written the rule wrong?

Thanks in advance...

Ed


______________________________ Edwin Covert, CISSP Enterprise Security Consultant Corporate Security Officer Integrated Communication Solutions http://www.icscorp.com 1-877-316-9659 (pager)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
Comment: "Some things should be seen and some should not..."

iQA/AwUBOM0mWzIjXbhrEgfyEQL89QCaA0YhCuDvwAYbDZWVLyIDJyh11JwAn0jd
6BQVcGkbwxDnBhizHOZtYGcq
=2Moe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment converted: Felix:Edwin B Covert, CISSP.vcf 9 (TEXT/TBB6) (00052449)

-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Emerson Tel: +1.407.380.0220 x106 Global Technology Associates, Inc. Fax: +1.407.380.6080 3505 Lake Lynda Drive Mobile: +1.407.310.8564 Suite 109 Pager: +1.888.440.8232 Orlando, Florida 32817 Email: paul_at_gta_dot_com USA Web: http://www.gta.com Mobile Email: 407.310.8563_at_messaging.sprintpcs_dot_com -------------------------------------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Global Technology Associates, Inc